Let’s Make a Deal

Step right up folks! You too can play God!

Couple Let's you Vote on whether they get an abortion

(I have attempted to go to the website birthornot.com but have not been able to access it. I have found this story on numerous news sites; I don’t believe it is a hoax)

The value of a human life has now become so cheapened that people are actually letting others decide on their reproduction plans. I can’t tell you (although I’m sure you can surmise) how much even the thought of this sickens me.

The couple above (in case you don’t want to read the article) have become pregnant, and unfortunately miscarried three times. They have chosen to become pregnant a fourth time. Instead of allowing the pregnancy to be a private matter, full of the anticipation, and possibly sadness of the outcome; they have chosen instead to allow outsiders to determine the fate of their child.

The child in this case is not referred to as a fetus or embryo; it is “an unborn baby boy”. They have posted ultrasounds, videos and health updates on their website. At this writing the pregnancy is in its 17th week; the baby has begun forming pads on fingertips and toes; this is the 2nd trimester of pregnancy. Cartilage is beginning to harden into bone, the baby is about 5 ounces and 5 inches long. He can hear the heartbeat of his mother. His urinary tract, brain, muscles nervous and circulatory systems are functioning.

According to the Guttmacher Institute http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_OAL.pdf, 38 states prohibit abortions, generally except when necessary to protect the woman’s life or health, after a specified point in pregnancy, most often fetal viability. Fetal Viability varies, but is usually accepted at 24 weeks.

So although this couple is calling their boy a baby, he is not a viable pregnancy in terms of medical definitions. Does that make it acceptable for them to leave his life – or death – at the hands of strangers based on the click of a mouse? Have we become such slaves to the reality show mentality that the life of another is only based on a lottery of votes?

Many people say a child is not a child until they are born. Anything inside the mother’s uterus is her choice to end or continue. Without attempting to judge (which many of you will say I am), how can something that is growing, breathing, moving and consuming energy not be alive? We as a “human” race spend so much time trying to save whales and trees and owls and other endangered species, yet look so derisively upon a collection of cells that will, through the miracle of pregnancy, become a human being.

So let’s consider the possible outcomes of this scenario (provided someone with legal prowess doesn’t derail the freedom of choice of this couple).

Outcome 1: The Arnolds decide to abort the baby (aka ‘terminate the pregnancy’).

Abortion is legal in many states (probably theirs). Many states don’t outline that the mother’s health or the health of the baby must be factors for abortion. Abortion is their choice.  My question here is why did they get pregnant in the first place? If abortion were legally considered murder, are the voters that chose abortion co-conspirators? Should they be held to the same legal standards as criminals who conspire or take part in the murder of another human?
Outcome 2: The Arnolds have a miscarriage.

They will have a public ready and willing to support them in their time of sadness. The publicity and endorsement of all kinds of products could be at their doorstep.

Outcome 3: The Arnolds carry the baby full-term and deliver a healthy baby boy.

This is not necessarily the happiest of outcomes. Given our penchant for publicity and making a buck at others expense, imagine this boy in school just a few years later. Some know-it-all kid or parent will spout off the true details of his birth. It’s on the internet. He or any number of other people could look it up at will for the rest of forever. (Don’t think it will happen? Ask me how many times in my childhood I was told that because I was adopted my parents didn’t want me; that I was dumped or given away. That’s not the truth, but it hurt nonetheless as a child.)

Abortion is not a crime (unfortunately in my opinion). Publically declaring your pregnancy is not a crime. Becoming a reality-show wanna-be is not a crime. But allowing others to determine your child’s future should be.

Banning Bacon

Imagine if you will a world with no bacon. For some people the mere thought of no bacon for breakfast sends them into a quasi-withdrawal state complete with shakes and delirium. For others, who have never had pig products, the thought is not so horrifying.

A (not complete) list of things made from pig:

• Bacon

• Ham
• Pork Roast
• Ribs
• Pork Chops
• Sausage
• Hot Dogs
• Heart valves
• Insulin
• Skin (for burn victims)
• Cellophane
• Floor waxes
• Insulation
• Matches
• Glue
• Plastic
• Antifreeze
• Pistons
• Rubber
• Wiper Fluid
• Buttons
• Fabric Dye
• Fertilizer
• Insecticide
• Weed Killers
• Artist brushes
• Chalk
• Crayons
• Dartboards
• Joysticks (game controller)
• Pool Balls
• Pig Ears/Hooves (dog chew toys)
• Lipstick
• Jello
• Suede

What about these “pig” items:

• Toy Farm Sets

• Jones Bacon Flavored Soda

• Piggy Banks

• Footballs

Famous Pigs in History:

• Miss Piggy

• “Babe” (pig Movie)

• Charlotte’s Web (Wilbur)

• Piglet

• Olivia

• Napoleon (Animal Farm)

• Three Little Pigs

And the lists go on and on. So let’s consider for a moment this article from the Daily UK: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1329897/Early-Learning-Centre-toy-pig-banned-farm-set-avoid-offending-Muslims.html

Basically, a few people, presumably from the religion of Islam, complained about the pig in the farm set. The store decided to remove all the pigs from any sets they sold so as not to offend “Muslims and Jews”.

So the lesson to be learned here is that pigs are bad – all pigs – for all people. The offense of a few is more important than the good as a whole.

I’m wondering when this lesson will transfer to other things such as fashion, housing, and other foods. For instance, I hate liver. And there are some religions that don’t believe that animal organs are acceptable to eat. So should all animal organs be considered banned? No chicken hearts or haggis or blood pudding?

What about books? Movies? Tattoos?

What about when someone finds cows or dogs offensive? Will I be required to get rid of my pet? Stop drinking milk? Give up my surf n turf? Destroy all service animals?

History would have to (once again) be revised to delete the “Pig War” and the “Bay of Pigs Invasion”.

When something is offensive to a group of people, whether for religious reasons or personal ‘taste’; is it necessary that the entire community (world, city, country) relinquish their rights and traditions for the beliefs of a few?

A few words of instruction: If you don’t want the pig, don’t buy the farm set. Or, toss the pig (and the oinker and trough) into the garbage. If you don’t believe in eating pork, then don’t go to the baseball game or the work BBQ. If pigs are unclean, then don’t live in a rural (farm) area. Shop in a halal or kosher store instead. Don’t read books or watch movies that might possibly include pigs.

But, while you’re avoiding all pig products, don’t get diabetes, have heart issues or get burned. Don’t drive cars, color with crayons, wear lipstick or watch re-runs of “The Muppet Show”. And for heaven’s sake, don’t use matches or buttons or wear shoes. Because you’ll be breaking your own ban.

http://www.michigan.gov/mda/0,1607,7-125-2961_2971-72781--,00.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pork

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_pigs

Totally Random Trivia about me:

• I will not drink by myself; not even a glass of wine if my husband isn’t home.

• I will not take more prescription meds than I am decades old (I am 47, so I will only allow myself 4 prescriptions)

• I won’t call people before 8 AM or after 10 PM; even if they tell me it’s okay.

• I can’t sleep with socks on.

• I don’t like to change my clothes more than once a day.

• I can’t watch or listen to performers with strange facial or vocal inflections.

• I can’t drive with my coat on.

• I get irritated by “spam” postings (please post this or email this if you support this)

• I am equally gullible and skeptical about many things.

• I grocery shop one aisle at a time even though I have a list.

• I will not buy a CD unless there are at least two songs on the album that I know and like.

• I don’t like to watch a movie of a book I’ve read because I’m always disappointed in one or the other.

• I don’t like to start a project I can’t finish. But I rarely, in reality, ever am able to finish anything anymore.

• I hate gardening with gloves on.

• I think flossing is over-rated.

• I believe animals understand human language, not just tone and mannerisms.

• I think conspiracy theorists may not be as crazy as we think they are.

• Animals should never have human names.

• I’m not good at remembering where people live when I’m driving there, unless I’ve driven there several times.

• I have absolutely no concept of street layouts and get lost unless I drive by map or landmarks.

• I’m horrible at remembering birthdays. I’m even worse at choosing, buying, addressing and mailing cards to those with birthdays.

• I have always wanted to be a drummer

• I don’t want to live past 70 years of age.

• I believe there is one true love for every person on this earth; but I believe that some people can have more than one true love. I also believe that some people never find their one true love.

• Bagpipe music makes me weepy, happy and want to dance at the same time.

• I am a frustrated writer.

• I have a list of celebrities I would love to have dinner with but would never walk up to them at a table and ask for their autograph or express my appreciation of them.

• I am as equally shy and retiring as I am opinionated and sociable; but it’s hard to tell what will come out when.

• I can eat an entire box of Kraft Macaroni & Cheese by myself.

• I hate liver, but love liverwurst and pate’.

• I love salami and blue cheese sandwiches (sourdough bread and mayonnaise)

• I don’t buy movies that make me cry or watch movies about horses.

Green is a color

Being “Green” is pretty much force-fed to us on a daily basis through the media and anyone else that professes to be concerned about our planet. And, although I agree that we should be good stewards of our planet, our communities, our lives; I’m a bit underwhelmed by the idealism that living this kind of lifestyle forecasts.

So bear with me as a ramble for a bit…

So, I read this piece from the Washington Examiner http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/special-editorial-reports/Portrait-of-a-Big-Green-activist-who-scares-your-kids-1038384-104011958.html

And the corresponding video from Annie Leonard http://www.storyofstuff.com/

Then I got dressed and thought about how I spend my consumer life. NEW non-consumable items I have purchased in the last two months include:

• various home improvement things like flashing, a couple of 2x6 boards, lawn fertilizer, fence sections
• dividers for our utensil drawers
• underwear
• a birthday gift for my husband (no I’m not telling you what it is – he reads my blog)
• Home school curricula
• puppy and new pet needs (dog dish, lead, harness, crate)
• Garden stakes for my leaning Daphne’s
• Energy efficient windows (not the old single pane ones) for the two downstairs windows
• A new freezer and a new (2nd) fridge

We also purchased a refurbished HP laptop to ‘replace’ mine. My ‘old’ laptop will be retro-fitted and given to Blake for his home school DVD needs. Russ has also purchased a few computer replacement parts in his computer repair home business.

Of course, like everyone else, we purchase consumables like Toilet paper, groceries, pet food, etc. I try to buy organic as I can, and watch the sizes I purchase if possible to cut down on recycling and garbage. But honestly, it’s not always convenient (as in within the realm of time and distance) to run to Costco every time the kids forget to put dishwasher tabs on the list or I need juice bags for lunch.

We shop at Costco where we usually purchase meat, lunch makings, batteries, eggs, milk and frozen things like mini-corn dogs, hamburger patties, and tortellini/pasta. I usually go once a month, then we spend the afternoon repackaging the meat into smaller meal quantities. I as a rule avoid purchasing fruit or vegetables at Costco as we don’t use them fast enough and then throw them away. Yes, we buy movies there, socks and the occasional “oooh!” item, but we have really tried to stay away from that stuff unless we are buying gifts or just need to look around. Our recycling bin is as full every week as our garbage bin. We try hard not to purchase things in smaller packages, and to throw our cans and bottles and plastics in the bin; cardboard and paper too. I’ve attempted to compost grass clippings but either forget to religiously turn it or it rains and rains and the pile turns into a wet, mildew-y lump of slime.

As for clothing, I purchase most of our outerwear at Value Village. Yeah, that’s right, Value Village. I think in the last year, I have purchased maybe 20 items total for the entire family (not including socks & underwear) brand new. A little black dress for a fundraiser we attended, dress shoes for both boys for church, sporting goods like shoes (we used the baseball ones for football, too) and rib pads, and a dress shirt for a school event. I buy James’ extra-long-legged jeans at a western store (bought two pair August 2009 in Centralia). The youngest wears hand-me-downs from cousins, friends and garage sales. We then pass his out-growns to family and friends or donate them to charity. We save James’ clothing in the event that Blake will have legs that long (arms too!) and that he can wear them; if he can’t those will be donated as well. I’ve bought plenty of very nice work shirts (Polo and button up) for Russ, workout shorts for Blake and miscellaneous summer or extra clothing for the kids I nanny (you know, you can never have too many extra bathing suits, swim trunks or leggings in case a sudden outbreak of summer happens or the kids get dirty). I even buy CD’s, books and DVD’s at thrift stores.

I donate what we can’t use, haven’t used, have outgrown, or still works but we got a ‘new’ one (as in new to us) to charity. (yes, I still have a full garage of stuff we’re keeping or I haven’t sorted through yet – but three parent’s-worth of households, scrapbook, genealogy and photo albums aren’t going anywhere NEAR the dump.)

We have three TV’s. One is a 9 inch (?) version that has a VCR and sat on my mom’s desk in her nursing home. The 2nd one we received from my son-in-law when they upgraded their set to a flat screen. The third one is a 32” that we got when my (other) son-in-law worked maintenance at a local retirement home. One of the resident’s was getting rid of it because it wouldn’t change channels anymore. So he was throwing it out and getting a brand new one. My son-in-law brought it to our house; we spent $60 on cables, hooked it into our VCR and have never had a bit of trouble with it. It is NOT HD. It does NOT have surround sound. We don’t seem to mind that Transformers and Ironman don’t sound like they do in the theaters. It does tick me off that my screen seems to have ‘gotten smaller’ due to the advent of every TV station on the planet assuming we’re all going to run right out to Best Buy and throw money at an HDTV with surround sound so we can see the outside edges of the fire or car accident on the local news.

I have never in my life purchased a new couch. My mother bought me a hide-a-bed couch when I graduated from HS; which was my bed in my apartment until we moved my old bedroom set up (gold trim and canopy included) into that apartment. That couch lasted about 12 years before it fell apart. Russ had a couch that he had purchased new before we met; when that one fell apart (10 years), we got a used one from someone moving into a smaller place. It was about 20 years old when we got it. Since then we’ve had two other ‘used’ couches from friends.

We purchased a new headboard, footboard and frame two (?) years ago for the new foam mattress we purchased. Prior to that, we had my mother’s CA-King mattress on the frame with no head or footboard. I have the dining room table and chairs that my mother purchased in 1947 as our main table. The chairs need repair, so currently they are in the garage waiting for the budget and time to have them repaired. We purchased new card table chairs because his parents set and my parent’s set finally fell apart. After about 30 years. We still have the card tables.

I have 8 car seats in various stages. Only a couple of them have been purchased by us; most are recycled from friends whose kids grew out of them. I keep them in my garage and use them as the various kids I watch grow in or out of them; same with the potty seat, high chair, stroller, kitchen booster seat and port-a-cribs.

I drive a 1993 Chevy Suburban; not very fuel efficient, but it carries everyone. We’ve taken scout trips, towed trailers, moved furniture, gone to the dump (that would be “landfill” for those that need eco-translations) and even taken a couple of vacations in the rig. My husband drives a 2001Infinity. He commutes about 30 miles to work every day. Both cars are paid for and we try to keep up on maintenance and repairs. Buying newer more ‘energy efficient’ vehicles will only help the car companies. What exactly will happen to our former cars when we no longer have them? They’ll be land-filled or owned by someone(s) else contributing to the supposed carbon toxicity of our air; AND there will be two more cars on the road.

We live in a house that was built in 1965; we are the 2nd owner of the house. We have remodeled the kitchen, bathroom (twice), repainted each of the bedrooms at least twice, landscaped the yard, built a deck, and added on a 2nd car garage/workspace. I have not put in bamboo flooring (too expensive) or exotic wood on the deck (WAY too expensive). We attempted to sell or donate any useable materials from every remodel; but who in their right minds really wants 40 year old (ugly) brown cabinets with (even uglier) vegetable-print contact paper inside? And the flooring was literally in pieces the size of cotton balls when we removed it. We did sell the old stove though…for about $25.



What’s my point? I think we are fairly responsible people when it comes to saving our planet. I get pretty tired of being told how environmentally irresponsible we all are because we don’t have straw houses, bamboo floors, hemp clothing, zero (or less) population growth, compost all our food scraps and cut our garbage down to ‘acceptable’ levels.

Most of what I consider “waste” is not under my control. For one thing, I receive enough junk mail monthly to fill our recycle bin almost ¼ full. That’s wrong. Yes, I can stop it, and have attempted to through all the usual emails, anti-mailing lists, etc. But the circular ads just keep coming; the postcards from realtors, photography studios, colleges and recycling events. And the catalogs. Okay, I love catalogs; thumbing through them, looking at all the great stuff that I could buy if money really didn’t matter to me, or I wanted to purchase a bunch of crud I don’t need. But honestly, if I want something, or need something, I can go online or go without. And it is so much easier to ‘throw’ junk email away than junk paper.

And honestly, if we are really so concerned with being ‘green’, could the schools stop sending home information packets on a weekly basis filled with garbage printed on dead trees? I admit there’s a fine line between keeping parents informed and overwhelmed – most of this information could be passed out on websites or electronically. I get that not everyone has access. Fine. THOSE people can get the mountains of paperwork to sort through and (hopefully) recycle. I have email. And internet. Sign me up. Would it also be possible to put all the forms necessary for starting school every year online? Could I not just fill them out and either email them or, print them out myself and send them in to school? Of course, not everyone would. But not everyone does now and you still have to follow up with those that don’t. And while we’re at it, wouldn’t it be easier to publish school text books ONLINE? No paper, no replacing them every year, no headaches when they change the math program yet again to reflect the most current pathway to teaching our children nothing….sorry, that’s another post altogether. (I have to admit our local elementary just started emailing a weekly newsletter with links; however as I home-school I’m not sure if the packets o’ stuff still come home.)

I think we should stop building NEW apartment/condo complexes and single-family homes until all the old ones are filled. The construction industry can use their skills and talents to upgrade, remodel, retrofit and repair the existing buildings we have. No new skyscrapers until all the current ones are leased completely full. This will likely put my title company, escrow and realtor friends in the unemployment line. Tough to hear; but we’re talking about the greater good of humanity, apparently.

I’m tired of helpful and caring celebrities telling me to unplug my appliances when not in use and being lectured to about my use of power, while they ride in their limousines to awards dinners and after-event parties. So every morning before I go to work, I need to unplug my electric radio/alarm clock so I can come home and plug it back in, reset all the alarm times and go to sleep? And, you know that my TV (about 15 years old) runs through my VCR (about 10 years old) and connects to my DirecTV box. Every time I unplug the power cords for this setup, it takes 20 minutes for it to all get back together online. Most of that is the DirecTV searching for satellite and rebooting the system. And the helpful monthly brochures from the power company telling me I could save $50 a YEAR by buying a newer, energy efficient refrigerator? Not as motivating as they intend it to be. WHO ARE MY NEIGHBORS that are using 53% less power than I am – Oh yeah, they’re the ones that work 12 hour days and walk around in sweaters and wool socks during the hours they’re home.

I agree that everyone, everywhere should work to keep their place, their community a little better than when they got there. Pick up garbage (maybe they should host college courses on “Recognizing and Utilizing garbage cans in everyday Life”.); drive less, buy less, need less, recycle more.

Let’s start with advertising. I realize this will put MORE people out of work, but honestly the “gotta have or you’re a dork” marketing has got to stop. A newer, sleeker, better car with higher payments and more buttons will not make you sexier or richer. A bigger house just means you’ll spend more time or money cleaning and less time enjoying it (and you’ll get suggestions from the power company how to lower your bills to boot). A newer TV means more cables, and other upgrades like blue-ray or a newer DVD player. Better phones mean larger bills, more buttons and more to break when you drop it out of your pocket or into the toilet (you know you will).

Is it possible for things to actually be built to last longer; like they used to? I mean I have a dining room table and chairs that was built in 1947. Yeah, the chairs need new caning and one needs a new arm. The cushions are a horrid Avocado green. The table needs to be refinished because the varnish has worn off. But it’s 64 years old! I can almost guarantee that any table we buy now, regardless of how much we spend, would likely survive less than about 20 years. The old freezer and fridge were over 20 years old. I’ll be surprised if we get 10 out of the new ones. Very few things are built to last – precisely so that the consumer is required to buy another one in a short period of time. This is the part of the video (above link) I agree with. I’m all for saving our planet; but how about we start by learning how to really reuse things instead of constantly buying new to replace the old that still works but doesn’t look as fancy.
 
So can I choose to be pistachio instead of green?

Crossroads of Common Sense and Awareness

Explain to me why we are once again at the crossroads of common sense and awareness?


Lake Washington School District is asking for MORE MONEY (again) to lessen overcrowding issues due to the arrival of masses of school-age children into our district boundaries. It seems that our district and schools are in the enviable position of being well-regarded and highly sought after. The challenge here is that there are too many students for the classrooms currently available in system.

http://www.lwsd.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/News/Levy-2011/Enrollment-Projections.pdf shows the current and projected enrollment numbers for the years 2010 through 2021.

LWSD has proposed several ideas for changes in the local schools:

http://www.lwsd.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/News/Levy-2011/LWSD-Space-Needs-and-Solutions.pdf

• Converting special classes (art, music, computer labs) that have their own rooms into classrooms. It’s not clear where the special classes will go.

• Limit or eliminate full day kindergarten programs so that students will only go half day (freeing up the other half of the day for more students to attend, I suppose).

• Change the boundaries AGAIN so that schools have fewer neighborhoods to service

• Bussing students from overcrowded schools to less crowded schools

• More portables (elementary and High School)

• Build one or more elementary schools, one middle school, one High school

• build permanent classroom/facilities at existing High Schools

• Double shifts at Redmond and Eastlake

According to the district’s own information http://www.lwsd.org/For-Community/Tax-Dollars/School-Modernization/Pages/default.aspx Audubon Elementary, Franklin Elementary, Juanita Elementary, Kirkland Junior High, Lakeview Elementary, Redmond Junior High, Redmond High School, Rose Hill Elementary, Thoreau Elementary, Mann Elementary and Twain Elementary were all modernized between 1998 and 2006 (either building a new one or updating the old).

The following schools are part of Phase 2 of modernization (dates are completion or move-in dates): Carson Elementary (Fall 2008), Frost Elementary (2009), LW High School/Northstar Jr. High (Fall 2011), Finn Hill Jr. High/Environmental School (Fall 2011), Muir Elementary (Fall/Winter 2011), Rush Elementary (Winter 2012), Sandburg Elementary/Discovery School (Fall 2012), Rose Hill Jr. High/Stella Schola (Fall 2013), Keller Elementary (Fall 2012), International/Community School (Winter 2012) and Bell Elementary (Winter 2012).

Phase 3 & 4

Alcott Elementary, Evergreen Junior High, Juanita High School, Kamiakin Junior High, Kirk Elementary, Mead Elementary, Rockwell Elementary, Smith Elementary, Wilder Elementary, BEST High School, Blackwell Elementary, Dickinson Elementary, Eastlake High School, Inglewood Junior High, McAuliffe Elementary, Redmond Elementary, Resource Center, Support Services.

Phase 2-4 schools are either completed, in process or in the planning phases of construction; two of the Phase 2 schools are less than one year old. Were they already over-enrolled at that time? Did the district not plan for an increase in students for buildings that are theoretically to last 30 to 40 years?

Horace Mann was demolished and rebuilt in three months and allowed for little or no increase in student population in the new building (not to mention the parking lot disaster). How could this be? Did district planners not take into account the US Census of 2000 and the planned addition of hundreds of new homes in the local neighborhood? No, they instead changed the boundaries of neighborhoods that attended Mann Elementary.

In our Education Hill neighborhood alone, Redmond has had four of the 5 school buildings demolished and rebuilt in approximately a 10 year span (Redmond El, Horace Mann, Redmond Jr. High and Redmond High – Rockwell’s building is part of Phase 3 – Redmond El will be modernized again in Phase 4).

My oldest son, now a Senior at RHS, attended the first all-day kindergarten class at Mann Elementary (1998). It seems absurd that 12 years later the same district is actually discussing cancellation of the full-day K program because they don’t have enough classrooms for incoming students. How does this make our children “future ready”?

Changing the school structure from K-5, 6-8 and 9-12 will likely alleviate some of the overcrowding. But this only places a band-aid on the problem. It does not address the lack of planning and preparation by the district for the upcoming years.

Oddly enough, this is the same district that boasts about their increased WASL and SAT scores, but had only 5 of 12 Junior High and 1 of 6 High Schools meet their AYP targets.

According to RCW 82.02.050-110, new developments are charged impact fees to be used for “recover the cost incurred by government in providing the public facilities required to serve the new development. Impact fees are only used to fund facilities, such as roads, schools, and parks, that are directly associated with the new development.” Those funds, if managed correctly should be sufficient to cover costs associated with modernization of the neighborhoods they affect.

Several of the modernizations were covered through bond measures. And now, the district wants the taxpayers to provide more money for their mismanagement and lack of planning under the threat of larger class sizes and lack of specialty classes.

Excuse me, but haven’t we been here before?

Please take the survey at http://research.zarca.com/clients/88546/survey.aspx?sid=2&lang=0&data= prior to October 7th.

I Believe

• I believe abortion is wrong and adoption is right because of the impact they have had on my life.


• I believe the death penalty is right because that person made a conscious choice to break the law in a horrible way.

• I believe in life after death.

• I believe America was founded by men who believed that freedom of choice was more important than constantly being told by someone else what was good for them.

• I believe marriage is between one man and one woman.

• I believe the homosexuality is a choice. Although one may be born with the desire for same-sex relationships, I believe you have a choice not to follow through on every desire you have.

• I do not believe AIDS is a punishment from God for homosexuality. I believe it is the human body’s natural rebellion against things that are not healthy.

• I don’t believe that everything that everyone has should be a RIGHT. Freedom is not a right; it is a privilege that has been purchased with the blood of soldiers and patriots over centuries.

• I believe my money is mine and that I should be able to do with it as I see fit. If others want what I have, they can put the same amount (or more) effort and reap the benefits of hard work.

• I believe that people have lost their sense of humor in situations that are just downright funny.

• I believe that hate is an action, not a feeling alone. I hate Brussels sprouts. I am not a hater until I burn the crops of any of every Brussels sprout farmer in the country.

• I believe a difference of opinion is what makes friendships and people so interesting. The color of one’s skin, the religion and the politics of a person is not determined by their upbringing, but their beliefs.

• I don’t believe that having a different opinion and voicing it makes someone hateful. I believe that bombing and picketing and shooting and hurting others makes one hateful.

• I believe that anything that causes you to make poor choices over good choices is an addiction. You can choose to work on correcting your addiction. You may never completely conquer it, but your desires should not control your life.

Who is a Man of God

What does the phrase “Man of God” mean? Should it be used with a BIG G (denoting the “Christian God”) or a little g representing other gods? Can the “MOG” status be retracted? Do different religions and their gods have different standards for being a “MOG”? Can one be a “Woman of God”? Does Mother Theresa qualify?

Why the heck does this matter, you might ask…

I posted a quote from Gandhi on my Facebook page: “In prayer it is better to have a heart without words than words without a heart.” ~ Mahatma Gandhi. I had prayer on my heart and it fit my feelings at the time.

One of the comments made to this post was “Gandhi was truly a Man of God”. And that comment made me wonder what makes someone a “Man of God”? Which god? Allah? Buddha? GOD?

Wikipedia defines “Man of God”, in the Hebrew Bible is a title of respect applied to prophets and beloved religious leaders. The term appears 77 times in 71 verses of the Hebrew Bible, in application to up to 12 individuals. I did not locate other Wiki entries or information on being a “Man of God” that did not apply to the Hebrew Bible.

There are websites delineating who are men of God; and books written about the subject. However in my Google searches, all appear to be about the Christian God. Gandhi followed Hinduism; which has several gods (Indra, Varuna, Agni). So, can Gandhi, a Hindu man, be considered a man of God or a man of many gods?

Romans 1:18-25 states: 18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, 19 because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them. 20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, 21 because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Professing to be wise, they became fools, 23 and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man—and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things. 24 Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves, 25 who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.

The freedictionary.com defines “man of God” as:

n
1. (Christianity / Ecclesiastical Terms) a saint or prophet

2. (Christianity / Ecclesiastical Terms) a clergyman

If we use this definition then, anyone who obtained sainthood or was a prophet could be considered a man of God. But again, what God? What deity determines a person’s godliness? Is it possible to be a man of the Christian God but not a man of the Hindu gods?

1 Timothy 6:11,12 (NIV) says: 11But you, man of God, flee from all this, and pursue righteousness, godliness, faith, love, endurance and gentleness. 12Fight the good fight of the faith. Take hold of the eternal life to which you were called when you made your good confession in the presence of many witnesses.

Some examples of men “of God” as listed in a Google search:

Tim Tebow, Hugh Hefner (see link below in case you don’t believe me), Billy Sunday, Muhammad (book), Martin Luther King, Reverend Moon.

http://www.somareview.com/hughhefnermanofgod.cfm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUc_JO7A6OU
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Great%20Men%20of%20God/great_men_of_god.htm
http://www.amazon.com/Muhammad-Man-Seyyed-Hossein-Nasr/dp/1567445012
http://tsutpen.blogspot.com/2010/07/men-of-god-22.html
http://tsutpen.blogspot.com/2010/07/men-of-god-23.html

So how can all these people be men of “God”? Martin Luther King was a Baptist, Billy Sunday an “evangelical” Christian, and Tim Tebow is a Christian.

Muhammad is considered a prophet of God, a messenger.

But Hugh Hefner? He’s stated that religion, God, is a myth. He’s an atheist.

Reverend Moon is allegedly the Messiah, but is the head minister of the Unification Church. If he is God, then can he truly be a Man of God?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unification_Church
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Myung_Moon

How can all these people be called “a Man of God” and yet represent so many different gods?